Serafin (Respondent) v Malkiewicz and others (Appellants) - The Supreme Court Case details Home Decided cases Decided cases Court procedures Visiting The Court About The Supreme Court Latest news Current cases Serafin (Respondent) v Malkiewicz and others (Appellants) Case ID: UKSC 2024/0156 … See more The Appellants published an article about Mr Serafin in a Polish-language monthly magazine widely read by the London Polish community, which alleged that he had … See more Web7 Jun 2024 · Serafin v Malkiewicz - unfair trials and the public interest defence in defamation. England and Wales. 06.07.2024. Download PDF. The Supreme Court’s …
Serafin v Malkiewicz and Others: CA 17 May 2024 - swarb.co.uk
WebSerafin v Malkiewicz and others Category: Libel and slander – Qualified privilege. The defendants had made out their defences of truth, honest opinion and public interest in the claimant's libel proceedings against them. The Queen's Bench Division further rejected the claimant's claim for misuse of confidential information. Subscribe Advertise WebSerafin (Respondent) v Malkiewicz and others (Appellants) [2024] UKSC 23 On appeal from [2024] EWCA Civ 852 Simon Burn Solicitors’ Partner David Magill recently acted for Jan Serafin in the Supreme Court in response to an appeal brought by Malkiewicz & Ors following Mr Serafin’s success in the Court of Appeal in 2024. elvis cotton candy land
Serafin (Respondent) v Malkiewicz and others …
Web17 May 2024 · Serafin v Malkiewicz. Reference: [2024] EWCA Civ 852. Court: Court of Appeal. Judge: Lewison, McCombe and Haddon-Cave LJJ. Date of judgment: 17 May 2024. Summary: Libel – public interest – truth – damages – unfair judicial treatment. Download: Download this judgment. Appearances: Alexandra Marzec (Appellant) Instructing … Web3 Jun 2024 · Serafin (Respondent) v Malkiewicz and others (Appellants) [UKSC 2024/0156] The above judgment, handed down by the UK Supreme Court today, makes for fascinating reading about the extent to... WebWhilst David de Freitas's public interest defence was not directly challenged in the Supreme Court, it was examined at some length in the defamation appeal in Serafin v Malkiewicz and others. Lord Wilson, delivering the unanimous judgement of the five-member panel, dismissed this criticism with the words "I can discern no basis for that criticism". ford hr online pay stub/change password